A team of researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania used fruitflies to probe deeper into the cellular and molecular mechanisms that govern aggression and sleep. They found that sleep deprivation reduces aggression in fruitflies and affects their reproductive fitness. The team also identified a related molecular pathway that might govern recovery of normal aggressive behaviors. The work was published in eLife.
First author Matthew Kayser, MD, PhD, an assistant professor of psychiatry, and the team focused on several chemicals that have been associated with aggression in fruitflies and other species. “There has been a lot of work on these monoamines, the same ones that are potentially involved in some aspects of mammalian aggression,” Kayser says in a release. “We asked what happens if we try to activate dopamine receptors or octopamine [the insect version of norepinephrine in mammals], a type of monoamine, after sleep loss in flies.”
After flies were given the chlordimeform (CDM), an octopamine agonist—a molecule that initiates a physiological response when binding to a cell-surface receptor—and the dopamine agonist L-DOPA and then sleep deprived, the researchers saw that CDM rescued aggressive behavior, but L-DOPA did not. “If you activate octopamine receptors, you rescue the fighting behavior,” Kayser says. “The other drug L-DOPA makes them really active, but they’re not fighting.” Neither drug affected fighting behaviors when flies were not sleep deprived.
Kayser notes that the relative simplicity of the fruitfly model compared to working with mammals is a more direct approach to studying the sleep-aggression link. “We first sleep deprived the flies and looked at their fighting behavior, and saw a huge, very clear effect on behavior,” he says. “Suddenly they go from fighting quite a bit to sharing resources and not fighting much.”
Kayser and his colleagues also studied the effects of reduced aggression on social behavior, specifically reproductive behavior and success. “We asked the simple question, ‘Does sleep deprivation affect sexual fitness?'” The answer was yes: Reduced aggressiveness of the sleep-deprived male flies clearly impaired their mating success when competing with non-sleepy males for females. Again, the molecule CDM rescued aggression and so also mating fitness in the sleep-deprived flies, while L-DOPA had no effect, reinforcing the link between aggression and octopamine signaling.
“Not to over-anthropomorphize, but I think this reinforces the notion that aggression is important for certain things, such as mating, not just a negative behavior,” Kayser says. “In the fly, aggression can be important for carrying on a species’ genetic code, and if you do things that impede aggression, it can have negative effects.”
Next steps include figuring out the neurobiological mechanisms that control the sleep-aggression link. “Our work suggests that somehow downstream of the sleep neuron pathway, there’s a connection with aggression neurons, so we really want to understand what those are,” Kayser says. “We have reason to think they’re octopamine neurons, but we’d like to be able to identify exactly which neurons, and then how signals from the sleep centers are relayed to these aggression centers. The role of other monoamines, such as serotonin, remains to be explored as well.”
Much of the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in behaviors such as sleep and aggression have been found to be highly conserved across species, raising the possibility of translating the present research to humans. “I definitely see the potential for translation here, although it may be in the distant future,” says senior author Amita Sehgal, PhD, a professor of Neuroscience and director of the Chronobiology Program. Sehgal is also a Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) investigator.
“That translation is always in the back of our minds,” Kayser says. “I have seen patients with dysregulation of aggressive behavior that’s not specific to any single disorder. If this type of work can someday open the door to a different way to effectively control, treat, or modulate aggression, that would be a pretty fantastic thing. Right now, from a pharmacological perspective, we don’t have a handle on more targeted interventions. I think that’s a real attraction to studying aggression in the fly—to work on the cellular and molecular controls to understand the basic biology of this pathway so we can leverage this knowledge into something that is eventually clinically relevant.”